Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 533209
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
I think you have misunderstood what HP really said. That he meant is at that time (W98 era) is that Linux didn't have to care about compatibility to *existing* apps bc there weren't any, while MS had to put up with mountain of hacks comming from DOS era.
For the record GTK which was one of HP main projects has one of the best binary compat track records in the OSS world.