Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Linux Miguel de Icaza: "To sum up: (a) First dimension: things change too quickly, breaking both open source and proprietary software alike; (b) incompatibility across Linux distributions. This killed the ecosystem for third party developers trying to target Linux on the desktop. You would try once, do your best effort to support the 'top' distro or if you were feeling generous 'the top three' distros. Only to find out that your software no longer worked six months later. Supporting Linux on the desktop became a burden for independent developers." Mac OS X came along to scoop up the Linux defectors.
Permalink for comment 533239
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Comment by woegjiub
by ze_jerkface on Thu 30th Aug 2012 13:08 UTC in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by woegjiub"
ze_jerkface
Member since:
2012-06-22

Somehow, there's a stupid notion that the lack stable *driver* API makes Linux far harder to support on *the desktop*


It's not stupid at all. Fixing an in-tree driver in Linux involves a submission/approval process and then you have to wait for the distros to pick up the change. A simple bit flip can take months to get to users.

In Windows you can fix a driver and then immediately publish to the web server. You can in fact automate the entire process with a single click.

Reply Parent Score: 2