Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 533268
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-08-29
You say "diversity". That's a very positive word. People feel good about that word.
I call it specialization. All of the sudden it's not positive anymore, it becomes very business oriented.
It boils down to the same thing: there are different distros for different purposes.
But the choice of words makes all the difference.
Saying "diversity is good" only works as a product slogan. It's what you say initially to convince the consumer to try out your product.
Sure, it's good... for the industry. But for the non-professional end user?
Once you're actually using the product and working with it on a day-to-day basis, that's when it starts nagging at the back of your head: There are all these other options. Did I make the right choice?
Diversity means you have options to choose from. But time and again, research has shown that too many options is just as bad as no options. Perhaps worse:
1) http://blog.kissmetrics.com/too-many-choices/
2) http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/27/your-money/27shortcuts.html
3) http://www.prismdecision.com/are-too-many-options-bad-for-you
Google "too many options". You'll get a ton more reviews, research papers and blogs about it.