Linked by Howard Fosdick on Wed 29th Aug 2012 20:25 UTC
Hardware, Embedded Systems Can Hewlett-Packard bounce back? Third quarter results are in and they don't look good. Total revenue is down 5% year over year, and profits tanked on a $9.2 billion noncash write-down on the 2008 EDS acquisition. What's HP's strategy? Meg Whitman has now been CEO of the struggling giant for a year. She compares HP's turnaround to that of Starbucks, saying "Usually these kinds of turnarounds take anywhere between four or five years... There's nothing fancy about these turnarounds. This is not advanced business, this is 101." I question if refocusing on core competencies is enough. Maybe HP needs to get into the smartphone and tablet markets. Maybe it needs to expand its services business. Think I'm wrong? Then bet your money on HP stock and get rich. HPQ trades at its lowest point in a decade and sells for an rock bottom forward P/E of 4.2.
Permalink for comment 533404
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: good hard with bad soft. ware.
by MOS6510 on Fri 31st Aug 2012 06:57 UTC in reply to "good hard with bad soft. ware."
Member since:

Shockingly I find out from sources within the printer community that HP doesn't even make their own printer internals.

Now Konica Minolta does make their own stuff... but only for their high end MFPs, the smaller KM printers are also made by someone else.

At work we have a Dell printer, when you open it it says Lexmark and Lexmark is owned by IBM.

Reply Parent Score: 2