Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 3rd Sep 2012 20:46 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Permalink for comment 533723
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-18
Wow, second item and the bullshit-o-meter is already peaking. This is just stupid elitism.
Yeah, because making things artificially difficult is awesome. What language has "Repeat" anyway? Does he mean "for"?
I'm nor a fan of nor do I program in .net but this is just more elitist nonsense.
And the stupidity just goes on and on. We don't have to code the same way we did in the 80's anymore. Not every language is C. It's called progress.
More elitist nonsense.
Yes, readable code is a very bad idea. Or not. Brackets are apparently awesome though.
Because everyone's screen is the same size. So if I have a wide monitor standing on the side it's perfectly ok to have a class that's really long?
This whole thing is just some C programmer(s) that got butthurt.
Edited 2012-09-03 22:48 UTC