Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 11th Sep 2012 20:28 UTC
Permalink for comment 534773
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
NB: My argument below is on good design where form and function are equal.
WTF does it matter!
Your app has a leather look or wooden look or notepad look or whatever.
Designers cannot win, some will opt for real world look and feel, some will want a more abstract design.
What I do like about visual masturbation is someone who has never used the system before can get an idea of what the "object" in question does (if done right).
The real world gives us cues, so why not use them.
I do agree that if the design gets in the way of function then I have an issue, but if all things are equal, who gives a #@$%
Personally, I don't care, if the app works and is easy to use and understand, then I'm happy.
iCal is very easy to use and understand, I have 0 problems with it.