Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2012 22:30 UTC
Permalink for comment 535180
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-08-09
I suspect that the reason for this is that Clover Trail makes away with a bunch of old PC conventions. One of the reasons why PCs have been unsuccessful at beating ARM in power usage is due to a lot of old hardware decisions.
This includes things like the PCI bus signalling being on a fast timer that can't be adjusted, the timer similarly, some aspects of the interrupt system, etc. These can be modified without end-user software having to care much, but the issue is that it breaks a lot of assumptions the operating system could otherwise make. As such I suspect that Microsoft and Intel have cooked up these modifications together, but Intel may not be intending to standardize them in this form, and will rather work on new fundamental PC platform specs that will replace both a lot of the current stuff and Clover Trail.
All speculation of course, but I highly doubt that this is a conspiracy where Intel secretly only gives the "good stuff" to Microsoft, that's just not in their interests.