Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 17th Sep 2012 16:56 UTC, submitted by Andy McLaughlin
Permalink for comment 535507
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-21
To be honest, I find UEFI ominous because, apparently, most motherboard manufacturers start with Intel's reference implementation and end up with something as big and complex as an OS kernel.
It's bad enough that the motherboard's firmware now contains enough of a network stack to spy on you and phone home if subverted. Does it really also need to be so big that it's statistically guaranteed to have exploits?
(When this BIOS-based motherboard breaks, I'm either going to buy a replacement from the crop of pre-Win8 mobos or I'm going to start my shopping at the CoreBoot compatibility list.)