Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Sep 2012 21:45 UTC
Permalink for comment 535685
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-04-11
Sorry, but this is open source paying for it's sins. If the open source folks had the smarts to replace the broken X.org in their OSes (be it Linux, PC-BSD or OpenIndiana) and made their OSes usable*, Windows wouldn't have 90+% marketshare, and Microsoft wouldn't have the power to essentially mandate exFAT for SDXC cards (exFAT and NTFS are the only filsystems supported by Windows that allow files larger than 4GB).
But with open source OSes being under 1%, if Microsoft wants to crush ext3 and other royalty-free filesystems, they have all the power to do it.
And if you think I am trolling, I really don't care...
*=and by "usable" I mean not breaking compatibility with existing apps every now and then and not breaking upgrades