Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 19th Sep 2012 13:19 UTC
Permalink for comment 535725
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-04-25
"What if" is always a tricky game to play. The N9 received rave reviews, but was hobbled by Nokia's decision to limit distribution. Had it been marketed as their flagship phone and a high-end complement to "Symbian Forever" (even with a knowing wink that no OS is forever), with the follow-on phones we now know were in the pipeline, would Nokia hold double-digit market share today?
Maybe.
But it would certainly be a more independent company, and I would certainly be able to rationalize their strategy and support them with enthusiasm (and my wallet). The current Microsoft-centric Nokia, not so much. "Windows" just doesn't call "leading edge tech" to mind any longer.