Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 18th Sep 2012 21:45 UTC
Permalink for comment 535899
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-12-05
Thanks for the "correction" if it really is one, but like I said, the blog entry that Wikipedia references doesn't seem to prove my original point. I believe my original quote that you were referring to was:
As you pointed out, the Wikipedia article you linked to claims that the Xbox 360 does not use a modified NT kernel, but I'm not so sure that I believe it without proof to back it up. The "proof" the Wikipedia article has is the following reference in the form of a blog entry on MSDN, which is what I was referring to in my previous reply:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/xboxteam/archive/2006/02/17/534421.aspx
That's inconclusive at best. I don't see anything specifically about the kernel itself and its design. I like Wikipedia, but this just seems like one of its weak points, and this seems to be a good example of it.
Edited 2012-09-21 00:18 UTC