Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Sep 2012 20:27 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Permalink for comment 536159
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-01-21
In that case, I agree with you.
One of the ongoing problems I've had with learning lower-level stuff is that all the educational material I've found seems to be written for either programmers skilled in other low-level languages or complete and utter newbies.
There seem to be no "C/C++/D/Vala/etc. for the experienced Perl/Python/PHP/Ruby/Javascript/whatever programmer" books or articles.
What that means is that I end up either bored to the point of distraction or unknowingly missing important lessons whenever I try to improve my knowledge of C and C++ as someone skilled in Python, mildly so in PHP, shell script, and Javascript, and having written one or two small programs in C, C++, Vala, Java, and Prolog.
For example, K&R's "The C Programming Language" was good, but, given that it doesn't even mention what a buffer overflow is, it's obviously written for someone who already has some familiarity with low-level programming in some other way.
Edited 2012-09-23 12:36 UTC