Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 536229
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-05-21
"my second screen is 24' 1600x1200, why should there only be one mighty fullscreen app on it?"
I completely agree. I was fully expecting to hate fullscreen apps, but I didn't. An "app" used to mean something relatively simple with small windows (think "terminal") but the new idea for an "app" is something integrated (think IDE, like Eclipse)
As for "the fashion", I think it is perhaps because of these gigantic screens that people are looking to simplify the desktop. The "problem" is that you have these constant distractions pulling your eye and having you subconsciously thinking about them. Originally this was a UI thing of other applications "pulling focus" from the one you're working on, but it's going deeper into even showing you things that you shouldn't care about right now so you don't get into addictive behaviour patterns like constantly checking your email.
I had some trouble with your second last paragraph, so forgive me if I understood you wrong.
I care about productivity above all. In the end, you could "it's confusing" your way to skeuomorphism, and you'd probably end up with something far more like iOS. The thing to remember is, there is no button.
And you know Kung Fu.