Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Gnome "Gnome 3 has received a lot of disapproval of late, from the Gnome foundation being charged with not taking care of its users, or losing mindshare, to Gnome 3 itself being an unusable mess. I've been using Gnome 3 myself for a few months to sort the truth from the fiction, and to try and understand just how the Gnome foundation expects their newest shell to be used. I will end with some thoughts on how Gnome 3 can be improved. The review will require a fairly lengthy preface, however."
Permalink for comment 536247
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by Sodki
by adkilla on Mon 24th Sep 2012 06:11 UTC in reply to "RE: Comment by Sodki"
Member since:

You mean like how Mac OS 10 is actually Mac OS 9 with prettier Window borders? I thought it was a huge difference. Don't recall seeing the dock and the Aqua interface in OS 9. People did not seem to mind the differences either.

Yeah, they should have called Gnome 3 the Garden Gnome XL Extremist Edition. That way people will get it that it is different and yet it is a product of the GNOME Foundation?

Edited 2012-09-24 06:16 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 4