Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 24th Sep 2012 15:07 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Permalink for comment 536426
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-13
Why are you so shy to explain what's wrong? Seriously, if you would be a teacher, as you try to impose now, you'd be a really bad one.
So let's accept there is a bug depending on integral representation.
The other bug of course is _your_ use of "int", apart from other issues.
---
About the confidentiality: Seriously, I don't know how you define it in your company. But that code is indeed something personal, as are his answers or his resume. Additionally, you've screwed that guy before the others, and possibly no one who opens his/her own company will now ever hire him, or upon changing the job give a recommendation to the boss.
I don't know. The mills of data are patient.
It boils down to: What business do non-HR ppl have with documents from closed-room-interviews? Why use the illusion of a closed room at all (I assume that by the timeline you imply)? Well, let me break your illusion of you being "better".
I'd really like to ask which company that is you work at, so I can put it onto my "never waste money/time on that" blacklist, neither job-wise, nor business-wise.
Edited 2012-09-25 14:00 UTC