Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 26th Sep 2012 23:25 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
General Development "Having read this, one realization is that better code often means less code. I don't think about lines of code exactly, or something similarly stupid, but in terms of meaningful code. However, argument for less code isn't about making code as compact as possible, avoid redundancy, etc. The argument is about not writing code at all whenever reasonable or possible. Should we focus on deciding what should and what should not built instead of polishing our software development craft then? Yes and no. Yeah, I know. Exactly the kind of answer you expected, isn’t it? Anyway, you can't answer this question meaningfully without a context."
Permalink for comment 536656
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Eloquence
by Lennie on Thu 27th Sep 2012 11:07 UTC in reply to "RE: Eloquence"
Member since:

My point was: if the programmer sucks at programming you'll probably end up with much more code which ends up doing the same thing just slower and probably more buggy.

Reply Parent Score: 2