Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2005 18:05 UTC, submitted by CPUGuy
Permalink for comment 53715
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-07
"Windows fan boys don't really care one way or the other. I mean, how long did it take for Linux distros to have decent looking fonts out of the box?"
Good fonts are an issue of quality. It wasn't like the Linux community pretended that good fonts wasn't of importance, but rather an issue of implementation. Symbolic links are a feature of convenience, which is clearly a concept borrowed by Microsoft an attempt to catch up to some technical benefits of *nix/*nux.