Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 18:23 UTC
Permalink for comment 537407
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
Because it represents totally different approach to mobilising Linux.
While Android is basically a start from scratch, growing from very simple and flat base (extremely simplified os layers, almost nothing derived from desktop Linux), supporting limited functionality, and growing fast.
Meego have tried to trim down existing destkop and server OS taking its time (evolving 2x longer than Android). Meego is much more integrated with overall Linux software platform and should benefit from this synergy (it will be interesting to see if it indeed does). It also bears much more development familiarity for experienced Linux programmers (98% of which are maintainers of OSS desktop apps).
One might think that Meego should have more bloat but apparently Nokia optimization engineers succeeded as (from personal observation) basic phone UI and example apps on N9, running crusty X11 behind, achieves much more consistent 60fps fluidity that Galaxy Note running CM9 and featuring relatively 2x more powerful hw. It's a great pity that QT is unavailable on Android.
Edited 2012-10-03 07:01 UTC