Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Oct 2012 21:30 UTC
Sun Solaris, OpenSolaris "Oracle today announced Oracle Solaris 11.1, delivering over 300 new performance and feature enhancements to the Oracle Solaris 11 product family." This stuff goes way over my head.
Permalink for comment 537656
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Doc Pain
Member since:
2006-10-08

"So any OS, no matter how powerful it is, will not appeal if the installer isn't a pretty conglomerate of GUI dialogs, in sequential manner, with defaults tailored for desktop use.


If you are talking about home users, I agree with you.
"

That's what I wanted to point out. Home users are considered the primary audience. Server OS like Solaris seem to be more and more regarded a niche market...

In the enterprise world there are plenty of ugly OS to chose from. For example, I fail to see what systems still running VMS or OS/400 (now z/OS) have to do with pretty.


You're confusing terminology: OS/400 has been called i5/OS, and today IBM i; let's see what name it will have tomorrow, z/OS is what MVS has been (the OS/360 line).

But you're right: Those systems aren't very pretty from a home user's point of view. Still they have strengths (like compatibility back to the 1970's), and many critical businesses (banking anyone?) rely on them. Also OS/400 is still very popular, but nobody really knows that.

VMS may be an exception. I know that MAN DIESEL did /at least 3 years ago) run VMS software on a SimH-emulated VAX system: http://www.openvms.org/stories.php?story=09/09/25/8154763

In my experience, it's not that much about "pretty vs. ugly", it's about "being different while seeing similarities". Still, most advantages come for the price of some inconvenience. I know many of them (having used mainframe, midrange and commercial UNIXes in many different forms) and I agree: There is lots of uglyness in them if you look close enough. :-)

Reply Parent Score: 3