Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Legal Previously redacted documents presented in the Apple-Samsung case do not support Apple's claims that Samsung issued a 'copy-the-iPhone'-order to its designers. It's pretty damning. Apple has very selectively and actively deleted sections of internal Samsung documents and talks to make it seem as if Samsung's designers were ordered to copy the iPhone. With the unredacted, full documents without Apple's deletions in hand, a completely different picture emerges: Samsung's designers are told to be as different and creative as possible. There's no 'copy the iPhone'-order anywhere, as Apple claimed. Instead, it says this: "designers rightly must make their own designs with conviction and confidence; do not strive to do designs to please me (the president); instead make designs with faces that are creative and diverse." I guess my initial scepticism about the documents was not uncalled for. What do you know - lawyers twist and turn the truth. Shocker, huh?
Permalink for comment 538140
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: lazy lazy lazy
by MOS6510 on Wed 10th Oct 2012 16:25 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: lazy lazy lazy"
Member since:

I think he's pretty clear what he wants, but you keep presenting him with other stuff.

To use your example: Jared wants to see a man, while you keep bringing him apes saying "it looks a bit like a modern human, so it must be one".

Reply Parent Score: 1