Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Oct 2012 21:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 538473
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-01
From this story hiring and outsider seemed a good idea.
But hiring one that has trouble telling best interest of his present employer apart from the former wasn't.
It validates the story of SW not being ready until late in 2011. On the other hand it proves "only one device" argument as present in the Feb 2011 cover story was twisted as it was the conscious choice, not platform induced necessity.
From the hindsight it now looks Google made a mistake by not offering any incentive for Nokia. They would at least have a counterbalance to Samsung and didn't have to buy Motorola.