Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Oct 2012 01:44 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Permalink for comment 538581
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Not really Metro itself, I think ...and anyway, from the current crop of smartphone operating systems, Metro might even be the smoothest when run on modest hardware - if anything, Metro is a "well designed high performance GUI" (but not "old fashion" - and luckily: because, in the past, adequate performance often meant nasty hacks, wasting lots of resources on them and asm). And it runs fine on netbook-class CPU, as does GNOME, don't exaggerate.
But yeah, it is a bit funny when coming from Mozilla, with how they had at least two abortive mobile attempts - and after each saying "we'll just wait for more powerful hardware" basically (in the meantime, Webkit and Opera took over)