Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2012 12:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 538701
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-06-20
http://marketingland.com/hands-off-microsoft-surface-tablet-review-...
Is this still the case?
Microsoft must be so proud of it. Considering their target is Apple's now 3 year old iPad1 you'd think they'd be a little more confident.
If your ad campaign focuses on a plastic snap (which will break) and will cost an additional $120 to even get it in the first place, you are in trouble.
They always shoot for apple and end up hitting disaster land almost every time.