Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Oct 2012 12:14 UTC
Permalink for comment 538850
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-07-04
http://www.osnews.com/story/26274/Surface_for_Windows_RT_just_199_
It would have sold like hotcakes at $199 or even $299. But $499? I predict a flop.
Anyone with a working brain knew that the $199 price was bogus. This device likely has the highest build quality of any tablet or laptop ever made; to expect it to sell at the prices used for the "piece of junk" market (like the Silvania Android tablets that are sold at drug stores and are literally given away by banks when one opens a savings account) is foolish.
As far as your "flop" prediction, you might want to actually put a numerical definitoin on that, and when you do so, know that Microsoft is only making 3 to 5 million units for the rest of this year. Given that, what is your definition of flop? How many must Microsoft sell by the end of the year to avoid "flop" by your definition?