Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 11th Oct 2012 21:41 UTC
Permalink for comment 539080
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Not bothering to support old hardware with new software releases is a common, although indeed despicable thing to do. I don't think it matters so much to the vast majority of end users in the end
Though I don't think Nokia can be really blamed much for this one, throughout most of Symbian history - the times when mobile hardware was making great leaps (proportionally) across generations. Probably a) last year hw would be typically to weak, anyway b) the OS was quickly accreting features (which ultimately contributed to its downfall, IMHO - at the beginning, S60 wasn't that much more than S40, for the user, and fitting the hardware of the time; but eventually it outgrew that UI model)
Plus I've heard Symbian isn't particularly flexible or comfortable when adapting it to new hardware - might explain why later models were stuck, or little hardware variety within generation. Or that no Chinese manufacturer picked it up, they all went Android.
It seems that there are enough people out there who like the feeling of fondling a greasy LCD for there to be a significant market for this. The question to ask in this case would probably be that of why it took them so long to release it and get it right.
S60 probably shouldn't be made touch in the first place - how it was for the first 2 years or so (S60v5, on the popular 5800, 5230), it possibly alienated many people.
And since this is a very painful thing to do once your brain is stuck in the endless nefarious cycle of development hell, I was applauding the ones who did this.
But was that what the engineering types wanted?... ;P
PS. Surely you joke here http://www.osnews.com/permalink?538675 ...Vista, failure? It still has more users than all OSX, and an order of magnitude more than Linux. So some ~fans wanted to see something in how Nokia doesn't announce sales numbers ...but Nokia wasn't ever very forthcoming per-model about them.
Generally, this approach of "it's their fault" WRT Elop - while the article shows wide institutional issues in which plenty of engineers surely also played a role. Above in the sub-thread there's "it was one of the few remaining tech companies with engineers in power" and yet we still put the blame at "the management" - at "them"...
Edited 2012-10-19 00:14 UTC