Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 539462
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 21:03 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 20:46 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/14/13 17:32 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
I'm very partial to CentOS 6 myself because it works in both server and desktop situations due to its 10 years worth of updates and the use of GNOME 2 (and ye olde but easier to admin Sys V init scripts). Hence, it's my primary Linux desktop and it's on most of the Linux servers at work too.
And if it gets a bit too "creaky" after several years of service, they'll always be the option to move to CentOS 7 at some point (though the beauty of CentOS 6 is that you'll get updates even after the releases of CentOS 7, 8 and 9!).
If you're coming from XP and want something that gets updates for ages so you don't have to do any major upgrades, CentOS (or RHEL) is surely the best choice?