Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 539640
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-03-24
My first Linux installation was RedHat, back in 2002, because many people and companies used it. So I decided to learn from what was the most popular. Then within a year or so, I switched to Mandrake as I was told that it was more user friendly compared to RedHat. After a few months, I found that Slackware maybe the one I was looking for because I was really sick of the RPM dependencies and I was quite happy with it. Several years later, my colleagues persuaded me that Debian is easier to maintain because of its package management system so I gave it a go. However, I switched back to Slackware a few months later eventually.
People might ask why I dumped a supposedly easier-to-maintain distro in favor of a nearly-plain-vanilla Linux distro. As a developer, I think I have the need to figure out what (libraries / programs) go together and what don't myself. If I "outsourced" the maintenance to a package management system, I may never realize all the gotcha's and hence losing the opportunities to know, which is not good to a professional.