Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 31st Oct 2005 22:08 UTC
Permalink for comment 53974
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-11
In a sense it continues the idea of now extinct home computers. No covering of all bases - this is *your* machine you've got here!
I have a feeling that this statement has to do with BeOS being a single user system. There's one serious problem with that - you can't use it for public computers in schools, libraries, etc, because the user would be able to screw around with the system in any way he wanted.
just browsing the BeBook (the Developers Guide) it is quite clear that Be Kits are downright Zen
Not to mention that it's been prepared to take advantage of multiple processors right from the start. I can't help thinking that BeOS might rise from the ashes (in the form of Haiku) at the same time that multi-core and SMP systems finally become widespread in the home user market. What if Haiku ends up being the best performing system under these new conditions?
I like the Be's choice of non-conventional features, like file attributes, MIME filetypes, the whole architecture.
I second that! To me, the Be Way just seems to be the Right Way.