Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 14:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 540006
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
I never thought you'd be right about this, Thom. I'd have never thought a physical tactile keyboard could be inferior to a flat touch screen one, but your right..if you change alphabets alot (and non-latin writers certainly do), then having an on-screen keyboard might be better than fiddling with multiple keyboards. Or even worse, trying to emulate one alphabet with a keyboard designed for another.
Another (quasi) solution to this problem is keyboards with LCD buttons:
http://www.artlebedev.com/everything/optimus/maximus/
In the long term, the best obvious solution will be to give touchscreens some tactile feedback that not only change visible pixels, but can dynamically produce tactile feedback similar to a conventional keyboard so we'd finally have something on par with real keyboards.
It could even do braille, what a killer feature for a touch screen!
Edited 2012-10-25 16:07 UTC