Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Permalink for comment 540034
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-20
Even if every Linux system used the same package format it would not solve the problem.
For example, Ubuntu 12 has moved to using an entirely new directory for .so libraries. How would you build a package that could install on Ubuntu 12 and on Debian and on Fedora, when all of them have slightly different file locations? And you cannot just define a %lib% macro because some programs need hard-coded file paths built into the binary.
Also, programs need to be built against different library versions. Some distros may be using libcurl.so.4 while others use libcurl.so.3. Or openssl vs gnutls.