Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 20:50 UTC
Permalink for comment 540192
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-03-27
Or if, you know, transsexuals or transvestites weren't referred to as revolting and disgusting. Or compared to computer UI's. Or if in the attempt to correct the first bigot's faulty analogy someone comes along and thinks it is humorous or worthwhile to explain why the bigoted analogy is faulty by exposing its technical incorrectness with an objectifying foray into human anatomy.
"Look at Nokia's N9 UI and how well it goes with that stunning hardware! It's like a blissful, successful, heteronormative marriage between a male who has the right jiggly bits and a female who has her own right jiggly bits! Because the first set of jiggly bits fill with blood when the male sees the female's jiggly bits and become stiffened which allows for the stimulation and internal lubrication of the female's not-so-jiggly bits, which allow for the entry of the stiff penis into her! What a great UI concept!"
Edited 2012-10-26 23:02 UTC