Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 14:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 540212
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-10-27
sir,
there is no such thing like "indo-european languages". what there is actually, is the aryan or irani languages like farsi, german, sanskrit, dari and others.
the term "indo-european languages" is a british invention ( or at least propagation ) who wanted to prop-up the hindus of india in the 1700's and 1800's against the muslim rulers of india, especially the greatest of south asian leaders - tipu sultan, the tiger of mysore.
secondly, is chinese really a "sino-tibetan language" or is that term again a invention of the british east india company.
lastly, about arabic... it is a beautiful language. only under it, the irani people contributed technologically to the world. otherwise, iran before islam was just a money-rich kingdom.
i am a socialist ( and follower of muammar qaddhafi ) and always keep the political aspect in mind of most things :-)
Edited 2012-10-27 08:31 UTC