Linked by cloud on Sat 27th Oct 2012 01:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 540230
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-10-27
you have answered your own doubts. the good os is simple in architecture, which makes it reliable and easy to add to ( modules ) or remove.
how much ever one "hardens" the linux kernel, how much ever ones one shifts whatever to "user-land"... by architecture linux is not microkernel. so this talk about "user-land" is shouting out that in linux there is not natural separation between kernel and "what ever one might call it". it is the entire architecture of linux at fault... or is there a architecture at all ??
i have 512 megabyte in my desktop ( mint linux ). i have to restart most days. it just hangs. i only use mint linux because the windows xp machine was not allowing me to access the win-xp boot partition.
don't forget the aspect of these complicated "dependencies" when one has to "install" some program.
what happened to the unix method of copy some program to a directory and just use it ??
Edited 2012-10-27 12:31 UTC