Linked by cloud on Sat 27th Oct 2012 01:05 UTC
Permalink for comment 540231
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
You're not making any sense here.
No, a good OS is one that fits its intended purpose. There is no single definition of a "good os."
And? No one claimed it was.
Oh, really? Why are there so many different operating systems which use Linux-kernel but an entirely different userland? Oh, that's right: you have no idea what you're talking about.
what happened to the unix method of copy some program to a directory and just use it ??
Ahahaha. Fail. Next time learn what you're talking about.
Edited 2012-10-27 12:32 UTC