Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 30th Oct 2012 18:10 UTC
Permalink for comment 540666
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-09-21
I have been using 8 since launch and really expected disaster, but was willing to deal with it because of the low price point. I must say, its really not much different than 7 if you dont want it to be. I installed start8 menu replacement, and rarely go into metro at this time, although metro really has not been too bad either, just needs more quality apps and a update or two before mouse and keyboarding becomes a little better.
And I know its not evidence of anything, but I think Windows 7 gave Microsoft alot of goodwill, because I get asked about 8 by a ton of people, who want to upgrade to it, and people like myself who bought it out of curiosity, and ended up keeping it installed.
Microsoft Didn't hit a homerun, but I don't think they exactly struck out either, Im gonna keep pounding away at it and reserve final judgement until its had a few updates sent it's way. All it needs are a few small changes and better integration between the desktop apps and metro, and things could get really really nice.