Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Nov 2012 23:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 541110
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-11-23
It'd be quite logical to switch, because ARM is just better in many ways; it's cleaner, simpler, needs less power, etc.
The problem [especially for big corps like Apple] is that ARM is constantly evolving. Software projects, like Debian GNU/Linux, or anything else can just write new code to work on new ARM hardware specification. Especially with open source / free software that is just possible and there's usually no 'money' obstacle there.
When it comes to hardware+software vendor, the things get much more complicated. Not only they would have to make their OS constantly available for ever-changing ARM spec, but they would also need to make their hardware updated every now and so. That doesn't make a reliable product, and that's what Apple wants for sure.
P.S Thom, in a fast changing world I don't think we have any chances to predict what's going to happen in a next 5, not mentioning 10 years. This is pure insanity. ARM could be replaced with other, even better HW platform. I'd be VERY careful to make any predictions about the future.