Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Nov 2012 23:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 541162
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-12
Atom is much, much closer to ARM in the low-power segment than ARM is to Xeon in the high-performance segment.
Here's an example:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/5770/lava-xolo-x900-review-the-first-...
CPU performance is at or near the top, while battery life and GPU performance is mid-range.
Keep in mind that the Saltwell core used in the this phone is manufactured at 32nm. Intel still has to move Atom to 22nm, and will have a new Atom core at 22nm mid- to late-next year. Intel is currently the only company selling 22nm devices.
This phone is a real product that exists, not the successor to a not-ready prototype that the article you linked to was about.