Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 5th Nov 2012 23:40 UTC
Permalink for comment 541180
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-12-16
...but you already have a iOS device emulator for Mac OS X... for 5 years now.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvOs6UpVJes
they (Apple) do not even call it "emulator" but rather "simulator" (since there is nothing to emulate! e.g. ARM
so this is not a issue (or purpose)! - switch Mac to ARM and than run iOS apps on Mac.
you can do it today.
--- but
take a look on today Mac OS X; you can burn CPU 100% if you do:
1) rendering
2) zip/unzip stuff
3) run Adobe Flash
4) some heavy PhotoShop-ing
5) Aperture
6) complex javascript/html pages
... and all this stuff could run even faster on GPU! (e.g. new Aperture heavy relies on GPU!)
on other hand, for:
1) chatting
2) skyping
3) typing
4) exceling
5) emailing
6) ~browsing
you do not need nothing faster than todays ARM!
all professional (content creation) application could benefit more from GPU than from CPU in future (as we have more and more advanced underlying infrastructure: compilers, languages, frameworks...)
...and one very important thing for future: it is easier to double GPU power than CPU power!