Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:54 UTC, submitted by Elv13
Permalink for comment 541657
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
No, because they inherited Apple NIH sindrom and wont use something because it is someone else idea (until they copy it, then it's theirs). So they did their own language and are working on their own toolchain too. As for copying OSX, once they removed everything, they will have a very nice base to start with.
</troll>
I'm afraid I would call that reality. After ten plus years of watching what looks like a duck I am forced to conclude that it is, indeed, a duck.
They are polite as long as you believe that their way is the best way.
So they don't understand point releases and they don't understand maintaining compatibility between those versions? GTK 2 certainly got that whether you think it is a good toolkit or not. GTK 3 is lunacy.
Well, if Gnome wants to support only one theme then fine. Great. It shouldn't stop people should they want to. However, the real problem is that they are enforcing this view through pointless breakages in GTK - a graphical toolkit that should be stable that people who don't use Gnome use.
The fact that they're filing bugs with GTK applications to tell people that they don't support something any more shows an astonishing level of intolerance.