Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Permalink for comment 541722
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-08-19
All the citizens already have a voice. They get to vote in the election. The only thing a popular vote would do is bypass the electoral college in the election, allowing the federal government and regional factions to gain in power at the expense of state power.
Surely you must agree that power must be as local as possible. Otherwise you support a big central government, and that's authoritarianism.
And it still wouldn't prevent the problem that the candidate can be elected with less than 50% of the votes.