Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 12th Nov 2012 15:56 UTC
Permalink for comment 542465
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
FAT is probably simply good enough, supported by everything (also millions upon millions of existing embedded, low-powered stuff), hence convenient.
It's not like MS doesn't support 3rd party file systems under Windows - all you need is a driver. Auto-launch its installer from a mini-partition masquerading as a CD upon hookup, and your device doesn't even need to have any trace of FAT ...but, somehow, nobody cares to do that. So we're "stuck" with FAT (at least MS even contributed some rather decent standard in the area, Media Transfer Protocol)
IIRC win2k also supports zip folders, BTW.