Linked by Howard Fosdick on Tue 13th Nov 2012 06:13 UTC
Permalink for comment 542469
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-15
I have a Pandaboard myself. The hardware itself is pretty good except for the lack of SATA, what with dual-core CPU, plenty of RAM, WIFI, Bluetooth, 10/100 Ethernet, loads of pins for all kinds of hardware - projects and so on. But the software-side of things, however....
Well, my earlier post on this very same news item says this: "Having to rely on closed binaries wouldn't be such a bad thing if they atleast were functional and kept up-to-date, but my Pandaboard is a rather good example of what these things can be at worst: on some versions H/W acceleration of decoding or encoding stuff doesn't work, sometimes X acceleration doesn't work, audio output from the analog connectors doesn't work, or like with the latest updates networking got broken and the board goes into a hard lock-up after 1 to 10 minutes!"
Basically if you only want accelerated X, nothing else, then it should work, but H/W accelerated video decoding will be totally hit-and-miss, and audio output will be reliable only via a USB-soundcard or over HDMI.