Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 22:24 UTC
Permalink for comment 542515
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-03-01
In addition while PC market is on the verge of slide down it's still much larger than it was then.
both Phenom's and Bulldozer's have higher TDP but lower IPC and real world performance (especially the second, with its statically partioned multithread architecture - static partioning is generally a bad idea btw) than Core's, this makes current FX's chips that few people would want to buy...
AMD really should have fixed their architecture's weaknesses asap, and churned out new models like there's no tomorrow (since their competitor hasnt rested on its laurels either) - instead it seems they've even taken some sort of development pause, like a sabbatical...
plus, they had a much better management back then...
http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/15/amd-is-imploding-because-managem...