Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Nov 2012 22:12 UTC
Permalink for comment 542644
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-12-10
Have a WebM/H264 comparison to verify that?
Here's a fairly thorough one that puts x264 above WebM's standard encoder consistently, both in terms of quality and encoding speed (encoding speed seems to be about 3x faster for x264):
http://www.compression.ru/video/codec_comparison/h264_2011/mpeg-4_a...