Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 542857
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-25
I didn't say the case had merit. It has just as much merit as the lawsuit over the iphone 4 antenna or the lawsuit over a stupid bug in location tracking - i.e. none of these case had any merit... They are all the result of stupid, attention seeking, whiny consumers making mountains out of molehills. The media just likes to pile on when the opportunity arises.
You say this is a non-issue, but "antenagate" was somehow a serious problem? Or a innocuous bug in location caching that accidentally kept data longer than it should have - that was worth the amount of coverage it got?
I don't know what to say. Did someone get hurt or killed? Is losing 24db of signal when you touch a specific point on the corner of the phone going to cause someone bodily injury? Did some guy get caught cheating on his wife because she hacked her husbands iphone backup and found out where he was last night?
Im sorry but ALL of this kind of shit is pointless media masterbation.
Get some perspective...