Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 14th Nov 2012 22:12 UTC
Internet Explorer "In Windows 8, we reimagined the browser with IE10. We designed and built IE10 to be the best way to experience the Web on Windows. With the IE10 Release Preview for Windows 7 consumers can now enjoy a fast and fluid Web with the updated IE10 engine on their Windows 7 devices. The release preview of IE10 on Windows 7 is available for download today."
Permalink for comment 542872
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[12]: IE10 still disappointing
by saynte on Sat 17th Nov 2012 11:22 UTC in reply to "RE[11]: IE10 still disappointing"
saynte
Member since:
2007-12-10


With VBR, AFAIK the bitrate refers to the video as rendered, not the video as compressed. Because WebM static compression quality per bit is better than h264, and because most video is lower motion rather than higher motion, WebM can deliver a higher (as rendered) bitrate from the same number of as-compressed bits.


That's not what bitrate refers to.

The output bitrate is clearly constant: the number of bits per frame is just bit-depth*width*height (*fps to get bitrate). You don't change the bitdepth and dimensions of your video dynamically, as VBR would imply if it was the "output bitrate" that was being measured.

You wouldn't want your movie bigger and smaller as the bitrate changed.

WebM does not have higher quality/bit(rate), x264 does, and that's EXACTLY what those graphs in the study say.

Additionally the author of x264 has a great breakdown of the WebM/VP8 codec, basically the short side is: it's alright, misses some of the psy features (probably patented, blah) that H264 has.

http://x264dev.multimedia.cx/archives/377

This guy knows his stuff; even implemented a VP8 encoder, so I think his bias, if any, is pretty non-existant.

Reply Parent Score: 3