Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Permalink for comment 542934
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
Your argument, whatever it was, is still null and void on that basis.
No it isn't
Errr, no. You made assertions you simply couldn't back up with examples, couldn't answer the question 'why'?, were out-argued, got your ass handed to you and you then eventually shut up. People who have that happen to them quite often then claim they were misinterpreted in order to try and salvage some pride.
Actually that didn't happen. I kept on asking the same question and you didn't answer it and deliberately missed the point.
At no point did I have my arse handed to me.
Unfortunately you don't get to tell me anything.
The guy is a lawyer trying to make a name for himself. Sorry if you plonking down what is a quarter of my monthly earnings it best to check the fact first that can be found on the website of the supplier of said product.
There is no black and white on this, even if you claim there is to be.
It is called a matter of opinion. I don't agree with your conclusion. The fact we are having this argument proves that.
Keep on throwing that word around ... doesn't make you right.