Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 16th Nov 2012 07:43 UTC
Windows A California man is suing Microsoft, alledging that his Surface tablet did not provide the advertised amount of disk space. The 32G device has 16G of space for users, as the operating system uses the other 16G. The 64G Surface leaves 45G free for users. The case will turn on whether Microsoft has clearly explained to customers how much free space the Surface leaves for their use outside of the OS. How much disk space does your OS consume?
Permalink for comment 542987
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[13]: Comment by ilovebeer
by ilovebeer on Tue 20th Nov 2012 04:29 UTC in reply to "RE[12]: Comment by ilovebeer"
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

I never claimed you were a paid shill. I also never claimed to 'hate' Microsoft. In fact, I have been using their products for over 30 years.

First, my reply was to both of you, hence why both of you were quoted in it. It's funny that somehow is above your head. Next, nobody said you claimed anything about a shill. Further, nobody said you claimed to hate Microsoft, but you do act like it.

Irrelevant nonsense deleted.
You repeatedly ask for what law in the US there was concerning this case. It was given to you, and now you claim you didn't ask for it?

What the hell are you talking about? First, the stuff you linked is not an example of an actual case regarding this exact "issue". Second, I haven't said anything about `not asking for it`, or whatever. Third, you're making up idiotic nonsense.

Childish name-calling removed.

You ask for a case that is relevant as precedent. It was given to you, and now you claim it isn't what it is? Do you even read the links? Do you even pay attention to the details of the articles?

You have yet to cite anything that addresses the "issue" you and your e-buddy thinks exists. I told you to fetch a ball and you brought me a rock thinking nobody would notice. Funny, and not in a good way.

Irrelevant nonsense deleted.

This is what happens when unintelligent people such as yourself pretend to be 'smart'. You just keep revealing how idiotic you truly are. You aren't a paid shill. You are too stupid for that job. No, you are just a dumbass who when called on his bullshit bullies others and calls them names.

You just did a horrible job of describing me but succeeded tremendously in describing yourself. How dumb do you think people are that they don't notice you point your finger at me for calling people names and in this very post you call me a dick, unintelligent, idiotioc, stupid, dumbass, and bully. Great job kiddo, you did the impossible. You made yourself look like an even bigger ignorant twit than you already did.

I know you will retort with further denials, further stupidity, and further bullying. I won't be replying further to you on this. It is a waste of time.

You are so predictable it's almost saddening. You are exactly as I describe a few replies ago. Behaving like nothing more than a wounded animal, lashing out in a last ditch effort to save yourself total humiliation. But, you had already failed in every way before reaching such a state of desperation. You lost the moment you decided to type your first reply because your own self-confusion of the "issue" has prevented you from coming even remotely close to saying anything relevant, interesting, vaguely true, or even worth reading. RIP buddy, better luck next time.

Edited 2012-11-20 04:33 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2