Linked by Howard Fosdick on Fri 23rd Nov 2012 14:03 UTC
Permalink for comment 543112
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Not necessarily. A small Wi-Fi router that can connect to an existing network would do the job as well, and could be located wherever you want the printer to be.
Obviously doing it this way isn't for everyone, but it's the route I'd take
"
Yeah, that's basically the same setup I use as well. Though I don't usually recommend it for non-techies because if you have desktops or other computers connected to the wired network, they're not going to be able to connect to the printer (unless you setup the wireless router to act as a bridge instead of a gateway).
Agreed. IME, a lot of the problems have to wifi routers trying to do too many things (AP, gateway, switch). It seems a bit silly to have a physically separate router, switch, and AP for just my small setup, but I've had exponentially fewer problems with that setup than when trying to use a single device for everything.