Linked by Howard Fosdick on Sat 24th Nov 2012 17:52 UTC
Permalink for comment 543126
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-01-28
BeamishBoy,
"Well, how about (a) access to engineers who know what they're talking about, and (b) a guarantee that if a problem can't be solved over the phone, we'll have engineers on-site within an hour for as long as it takes until the problem is solved?"
Although implied by the article, I don't know if it's really fair to compare free OSS support versus paid commercial support. If you need paid support, then pay for it, if free support is good enough, then it's good enough. It probably depends alot on how a particular company feels with outsourcing rather than having staff capable of managing all critical IT operations. Ether way, you can often get unpaid support on proprietary products and paid support on open source ones.